In a letter to President Obama today, U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, demanded that the Administration fully brief Congress on its proposal to reorganize the 12 federal agencies involved in exports.
Hatch believes that, to date, the Administration has not sufficiently consulted Congress on its plans, with more information being given to the media than to Congress. Hatch further said instead of relying on a new federal bureaucracy to enhance competitiveness, such as a вЂњDepartment of JobsвЂќ or вЂњDepartment of Competitiveness,вЂќ the President should immediately submit the three long delayed trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea to Congress for a vote.
Hatch wrote, вЂњMr. President, the solution to AmericaвЂ™s trade competitiveness does not lie in creating a new вЂDepartment of JobsвЂ™ or a new вЂDepartment of Competitiveness.вЂ™ It lies in fighting to aggressively open foreign markets to U.S. exports. One of the most effective ways to do that is through negotiation and implementation of strong international trade agreements. Fortunately, there are three strong agreements already negotiated with Colombia, Panama and South Korea.вЂќ
As Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee that has jurisdiction over the nationвЂ™s trade policy and agencies, Hatch continued, вЂњI expect to engage in full consultations before any proposal to reorganize U.S. trade agencies into a вЂњDepartment of JobsвЂќ вЂњDepartment of CompetitivenessвЂќ or any other new federal bureaucracy is proposed. Consultations with Congress вЂ“ who create, authorize, and appropriate for federal agencies вЂ“ must involve a significant exchange of ideas and opinions.вЂќ
Hatch’s letter to the President is below:
Dear Mr. President:
I am writing to request a status update on your AdministrationвЂ™s trade reorganization efforts. During the State of the Union on January 25, 2011 you noted that 12 U.S. agencies are involved with exports and announced an Administration-wide effort to вЂњdevelop a proposal to merge, consolidate, and reorganize the federal government in a way that best serves the goal of a more competitive America. I will submit that proposal to Congress for a vote вЂ“ and we will push to get it passed.вЂќ On March 11, 2011 you issued a Memorandum to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies further detailing your federal government reorganization priorities that was published in the Federal Register. In that memorandum, you stated that, вЂњThe first focus of this effort shall be on the executive departments and agencies and the functions that support one of our most important priorities вЂ“ increasing trade, exports, and our overall competitiveness.вЂќ
You charged your Chief Performance Officer, in the memorandum, to lead a comprehensive review of the federal agencies and programs involved in trade. The Chief Performance Officer and his team were instructed to вЂњconsult broadlyвЂќ with stakeholders, including Congress. At the Brookings Institute on March 22, 2011, the Chief Performance Officer in response to a question noted that вЂњWe’ve had more than a dozen meetings already with congressional staff and we’re starting to do meetings with members and we plan on keeping Congress involved through this process. As you said, it’s very possible that some of our recommendations will require legislative action.вЂќ To date, I have not received any briefing regarding this process and my staff has been briefed only once, and that was at our request.
The memorandum also required the Chief Performance Officer to submit recommendations to you on how best to reorganize the trade agencies by June 9, 2011. Media reports indicate that you received the recommendations in June. An Office of Management and Budget spokesperson told reporters that the recommendations were confidential and there is no set timeline for you complete your review and make any decisions. On August 13, 2011, The New York Times stated, citing unnamed officials, that the Administration may decide to merge the Department of Commerce, the Office of the United States Trade Representative and parts the State Department into a new agency, which could be called the вЂњDepartment of JobsвЂќ or the вЂњDepartment of CompetitivenessвЂќ вЂ“ as part of its upcoming release of a jobs plan.
Mr. President, the solution to AmericaвЂ™s trade competitiveness does not lie in creating a new вЂњDepartment of JobsвЂќ or a new вЂњDepartment of Competitiveness.вЂќВ It lies in fighting to aggressively open foreign markets to U.S. exports. One of the most effective ways to do that is through negotiation and implementation of strong international trade agreements.В Fortunately, there are three strong agreements already negotiated with Colombia, Panama and South Korea.
Over the past several weeks you have made it clear that these agreements are вЂњready to goвЂќ and called upon Congress to take them up. Of course, you and your team know that Congress cannot take those agreements up under Trade Promotion Authority until you first submit them to Congress. I urge you to take advantage of our eagerness to do so and submit each of these agreements to Congress at the earliest possible time.
Meanwhile, as the Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee, I expect to be fully briefed and kept up to date on the status of any recommendations to reorganize the trade agencies that fall within our CommitteeвЂ™s jurisdiction. I am deeply concerned about any proposals to place the Office of the United States Trade Representative into any other agency. This small but highly effective agency is one of the few bright spots in an otherwise bloated bureaucracy.
I expect to engage in full consultations before any proposal to reorganize U.S. trade agencies into a вЂњDepartment of JobsвЂќ вЂњDepartment of CompetitivenessвЂќ or any other new federal bureaucracy is proposed. Consultations with Congress вЂ“ who create, authorize, and appropriate for federal agencies вЂ“ must involve a significant exchange of ideas and opinions. To that end, I look forward to a detailed briefing and substantive exchange regarding any trade reorganization plans your Administration may be considering вЂ“ well before any plan is announced to the public and the media.